Date added:	2004-02-18	Posted by:	MaCkAn
Brand:	Samsung	Firmware:	N/A
Model number:	SV1203N	Manufacture date:	N/A
Model name / serie:	N/A	Buffersize:	N/A
Drive size:	120 GB	RPM:	5400
XBOX version:	v1.1	Progam(s):	hddlock
		Locking:	No
Additional notes:		Report this entry - Edit
Damn blew that harddrive :P

#1 - posted by (188.143.23*.*)

2014-01-06 05:19:53

Aaron,I'm glad that you mentioned the sinlge non default parameter a lot of folks are under the impression that the only type of converting constructor is one that has only one parameter, period. (Similar to how any constructor with all default parameters can act as a default constructor many people think default constructor implies no parameters.)Regarding making converting constructors explicit by default, I totally agree. I've heard Dan Saks (who was on the C++ Standards Committee) say multiple times that the C++ standards committee got it backwards converting constructors should be explicit by default, and you should have to go out of your way to change this default behavior. Hindsight!One thing I've done for certain projects that make use of a good coding standard & code reviews:#define IMPLICIT#define EXPLICIT explicitand require (via coding standards and inspection) that every converting constructor use one of these 2. We even had a Perl guy write a utility that would scan every class definition, find the converting constructors, and flag the ones that weren't marked as IMPLICIT or EXPLICIT.

#2 - posted by (139.130.2*.*)

2014-01-07 18:04:02

This is really cool. Such<a href="http://riunyuthqgh.com"> vietray</a> in the starting arrangements! It really has a huge impact on how one solves the puzzle.I have solved about half so far, keeping notes as I go, and I also noticed some variation in the solving times (so far the longest took about 10x as long as the shortest!).But I assume our votes are not necessarily supposed to imply difficulty or solving time, but a more subjective assessment of how much we enjoyed / admired / had fun with them (independent of whether we solved them quickly or slowly) ... right?

#3 - posted by (103.26.19*.*)

2014-01-24 11:27:55

Unquestionably consider that which you suepsopd. Your favorite cause seemed to be on the internet the simplest thing to take memo of. I declare to you, I certainly get angry at the same calculate as additional people care about issues that they immediately don't recognise on the subject of. You proscribed to hit the nail ahead the highest and too distinct made known the full machine without having side look , community might obtain a suggest. Spirit perhaps live rearward to get additional. Show gratitude you| http://fxhutjzrrqq.com [url=http://hidrzq.com]hidrzq[/url] [link=http://xdlhif.com]xdlhif[/link]

#4 - posted by (62.39.12*.*)

2014-03-06 13:37:06

QuotesChimp is frequently overlooked, because life assurance policy isn't needed for legal reasons. As it's vital for every single household to hold life assurance policy on anybody who plays a role in the household's financing, this is really a significant monetary error. With No correct degree of life assurance policy, the passing of a subscriber to your own household's earnings can cause losing of a property or hundreds of bucks with debt that can't be readily compensated.